Diagnostic criteria and reporting procedures for pre-eclampsia: a national survey among obstetrical departments in Denmark

Åse Kathrine Klemmensen, SF Olsen, CM Wengel, A Tabor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


OBJECTIVE: A precondition for the rational use of obstetric databases in biomedical research is detailed knowledge on how data are being generated. We identified the diagnostic procedures and criteria for pre-eclampsia (PE) and assessed the level of obstetric training of the personnel responsible for the records submitted to the patient registry at the Danish National Board of Health. STUDY DESIGN: A structured questionnaire, including three case stories, was sent to the chief consultant of the department. RESULTS: Thirty-three out of the 34 Danish departments (97%) returned the questionnaire. Reporters of pregnancy diagnoses to the National Patient Registry differed widely in training. For complicated pregnancies, departments ranged from having only specialists reporting all cases to secretaries reporting up to 50%. Cut off limits of blood pressure (BP) and protein loss used to diagnose pre-eclampsia showed large differences across departments. The diagnoses given to three case stories showed little correlation to the criteria the departments reported using. CONCLUSION: Even in a small country like Denmark with 34 obstetrical departments, there was little consensus on the diagnostic criteria for pre-eclampsia. The findings emphasize the need for standardizing diagnostic criteria and reporting practice and may have implications on how to interpret data regarding pre-eclampsia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-45
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2005


  • pre-eclampsia definition
  • pre-eclampsia criteria
  • hypertension in pregnancy
  • pre-eclampsia


Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic criteria and reporting procedures for pre-eclampsia: a national survey among obstetrical departments in Denmark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this